Originally published on TheNextGreatGeneration.com, August 2011
New laws requiring photo identification to vote are springing up throughout the country, prohibiting people without access to the imposed IDs from participating in local, state, and federal elections. Many differ in terms of what exactly is accepted, some have not gone into effect yet, and states without voter ID legislation have proponents pushing to join in on the fun.
Needless to say, some people are pissed.
There are currently 16 states that require voters to show some form of identification, such as a bill with the voter’s name and address – although photo IDs have not yet been mandated. Seven states (AL, FL, HI, ID, LA, MI, SD) ask voters to present photo IDs at the polls, although if they are unable to, other forms of identification that meet certain criteria are accepted. Seven stringent states (GA, IN, KS, WI, TN, TX) have strict photo ID laws, and although they are only currently effective in two states, they are expected to go into effect by the 2012 election. How convenient for lovers of the legislation, who argue that voter impersonation is the fundamental issue driving the need for new measures.
Now is when I’ll mention that there have been more U.F.O sightings in the past decade than claims of voter fraud in Kansas. In Indiana, there have never been instances of impostors at the polls – not one fraud case. Widespread voter impersonation in America does not really exist – and possibly unbeknownst to proponents of voter ID laws making these allegations – there is widespread evidence to prove it.
Opponents of voter ID legislation say the laws are discriminatory toward minorities, students, low-income individuals, voters with disabilities and the elderly, among others. Adversaries stress the consequential effect on elections, making the results unfair and essentially meaningless – more so for left-leaning candidates.
Those in favor of mandating photo IDs for voters have their reasons. But honestly – and this is not just because I myself am left leaning – the reasons are pretty silly. In Mark Hemingway’s article defending photo ID legislation, he stated that earlier this year, ACORN, a now non-existent political advocacy group, plead guilty to voter registration fraud in Nevada (Fox News is the source cited). Hemingway also took the liberty of including an “exhaustive” list of ACORN employees whose shady voter registration practices have been listed since 1998 (Rottenacorn.com is the source cited on this one – biased much?) – resulting in “dozens of arrests and convictions.”
Funny, the words “exhaustive” and “dozens” aren’t really synonymous in my eyes, but what do I know? I only just graduated college, and according to conservative writer Doug Mataconis, college students should not be allowed to use a student ID to register to vote because “Allowing them to use student ID to register to vote would be akin to giving them the opportunity to vote twice in two different locations.” Twice in two different locations? Really? You do realize that college students are part of the same generation that is constantly deemed lazy, never-voters-unless-it’s-a-cool-young-black-candidate types?
So far, students at state universities in WI cannot use student IDs to vote because new law requires IDs to have signatures on them. South Carolina and Texas prohibit the use of student IDs altogether.
But Texas allows voting by those who have a license to carry a concealed handgun.
As for proponents of photo ID legislation who say with insincere passion that there is no way – and they mean no way – that the laws are discriminatory against ethnic groups, try this on for size: as many as 25 percent of African Americans lack acceptable government-issued identification. Eight percent of their white counterparts lack the identification. Six million Americans aged over 65 do not possess the acceptable government-issued identification (totaling to 18 percent of senior citizens) either. But in no way – and they mean no way – is this legislation discriminatory.
Altogether, more than 21 million American citizens do not possess government-issued photo IDs. That’s 11 percent of the population that will be turned away from the polls this election season. So much for the fundamental right to vote. So much for the 1st, 14th, 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th amendments – all of which protect voting rights.
But at least we can take comfort in knowing that if you own a gun, you have a voice in America.